Minor project
My research question is whether performing analysis techniques of gamma-aminobutyric
acid (GABA) between photodiode array and
fluorescence detector by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). GABA is
a small molecule and has polarity so that a detection of GABA is problematic.
Moreover, some research studies, such as food and drugs, want to detect amount
of GABA in low and/or sensitive levels, for example in levels of milligram, microgram and
nanogram. HPLC coupled with detectors, photodiode array detector and/or
fluorescence detector, can be detected a chemical compound in a solution. In
addition, amino acids, like GABA, have a small molecule and do not have fluorescent
or ultraviolet absorbance itself. Therefore, one of the solutions to resolve an
obstruction is the pre-column derivatization. The pre-column derivatization
will use an agent providing strong ultraviolet (UV) or fluorescent
absorbance combined with the sample having amino acids before used in HPLC. This
issue is claimed that some researchers use an UV derivatizing agent and others use a fluorescent derivatizing agent.
Researchers using an UV derivatizing agent, 2-hydroxynapthaldehyde (HN), are Khuhawar and Rajper
and others use a fluorescent derivatizing agent, o-phthaladehyde (OPA),
are de Freitas Silva et al. The
former reveal that they are the first group to study about GABA derivatized
with HN and the latter notice that they have developed the method to quantify
the amount of GABA with OPA and 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)
Khuhawar and Rajper (2003) argue
that they find an amount of GABA derivatized with HN in a sample from central
nervous system (CNS) and have a standard curve ranged from 1.12 to 28 μg/ml by a
short C18 column. The derivative is stable more than 12 hours.
De Freitas Silva et al. (2009) argue that they have
modified a method to detect GABA derivatized with OPA and used MPA as a
stabilizer in samples from the rodent brain. They use a short C18
column and run with an isocratic system. A standard curve is ranged from 0.1 to
0.75 μg/ml
and the derivative is stable approximately 30 minutes.
Debate centers on the basic issue if
the comparison between photodiode array detector
and fluorescence detector shows an effective analysis of GABA because it has
not been studied in one study yet on this point.
My work will be closer to Khuhawar and Rajper and de Freitas Silva et al. for the season that I will be
conducting the two experiments to show whether each of techniques can be
interpreted results in terms of sensitivity, reliability and reproducibility.
Hopefully
my contribution will be the first study to give an idea of the result between
two techniques in the one research. Furthermore, this study could be represented
as information to guide other researchers selecting the suitable and sensitive
experiment to doing their research in the future.
Reference
List
Khuhawar, M. Y., & Rajper, A. D. (2003). Liquid
chromatographic determination of γ-aminobutyric acid in cerebrospinal fluid
using 2-hydroxynaphthaldehyde as derivatizing reagent. Journal of
Chromatography B, 788(2), 413-418.
de Freitas Silva, D. M.,
Ferraz, V. P., & Ribeiro, A. M. (2009). Improved high-performance liquid
chromatographic method for GABA and glutamate determination in regions of the
rodent brain.
Journal
of Neuroscience Methods, 177(2), 289-293.
Hi K. Kritchapol,
ReplyDeleteIn paragraph 3, I think the word "argue" should be "argued".
i think should be edit in paragraph 4, too. it is to be "argued"
DeleteMy comments are
ReplyDelete1: http://kanokudomsit.blogspot.com/2015/02/minor-project.html?showComment=1424884505402#c8507636252342317209
and 2: http://qquanta.blogspot.com/2015/02/minor-project-before-midterm.html#comment-form